Tad Denson/Shutterstock.com
Source: Stephen Wood / iStock via Getty Images
Source: CG-Photos / Getty Images
Source: HadelProductions / iStock via Getty Images
Source: SevenMaps / Shutterstock.com
Source: BZK Photos / Shutterstock.com
Source: SevenMaps / Shutterstock.com
Source: SeanPavonePhoto / iStock via Getty Images
Source: David Toussaint / Moment Open via Getty Images
Source: Sundry Photography / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Art Wager / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Anthony M. Inswasty / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Vibe Images / Shutterstock.com
Source: magaro / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Brad Schinkel / iStock via Getty Images
Source: (c) Salil Bhatt / iStock via Getty Images
Source: ZargonDesign / E+ via Getty Images
Source: Eifel Kreutz / iStock via Getty Images
Source: AUDREY SCRIPP / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Ken Badgley / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Shellphoto / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Chester Leeds / iStock via Getty Images
Source: JimVallee / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Solidago / Getty Images
Source: hlehnerer / iStock via Getty Images
Source: George Dodd III / Shutterstock.com
Source: Ajmal M Shah / Shutterstock.com
Source: Sundry Photography / iStock via Getty Images
Source: digidreamgrafix / iStock via Getty Images
Source: WanderDrone / iStock via Getty Images
Source: yhelfman / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Michael Warren / iStock via Getty Images
Source: RobHainer / iStock via Getty Images
Source: krblokhin / iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Source: SevenMaps / Shutterstock.com
Source: Derek_Neumann / iStock via Getty Images
Source: MattGush / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Peter Unger / Stone via Getty Images
Source: travelview / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Jacob Boomsma / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Jacob Boomsma / iStock via Getty Images
Source: GabrielPevide / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Janine Moore-Williams / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Aaron Echols / iStock via Getty Images
Source: ChrisBoswell / iStock via Getty Images
Source: Jacob Boomsma / Shutterstock.com
Source: Donna Brooks / iStock via Getty Images
Source: SevenMaps / Shutterstock.com
Source: kat-co / iStock via Getty Images
Source: TahirAbbas / Getty Images
Natural disasters are not a new phenomenon. These natural processes, from cyclones, earthquakes, floods, and tornadoes to landslides, volcanic eruptions, and wildfires, have occurred for millennia, the only difference now is our infrastructure and population growth are significantly higher. This contributes to the increase in destruction and devastation and makes certain areas, like these U.S. cities most at risk for natural catastrophes, riskier to live in.
In recent years, the United States has seen a higher volume of natural disasters that have led to devastating costs in damages and loss of lives. While no city or area is perfect, and every region has certain risks, some have more than others.FEMA's National Index Risk, a site that shows which communities are most at risk for increased natural disasters, allows the public to see how weather can, and does, affect certain areas. (These are wildly destructive storms that flattened entire cities.)
To determine U.S. cities most at risk for natural catastrophes, 24/7 Tempo reviewed data on natural hazard risk for U.S. census tracts from the March 2023 FEMA National Risk Index dataset. Cities were ranked based on the average National Risk Index score – a composite risk score of 18 natural hazards: avalanche, coastal flooding, cold wave, drought, earthquake, hail, heat wave, hurricane, ice storm, landslide, lightning, riverine flooding, strong wind, tornado, tsunami, volcanic activity, wildfire, and winter weather – for all census tracts within their borders.
Data were aggregated from the census tract level to the city level using spatial boundary definitions from the U.S. Census Bureau's TIGER/Line program. Supplemental data on the total value of all owner-occupied homes and population are from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Only places with at least 25,000 residents were considered. (Also see weather records we hope will never be broken.)
50. Sebastian, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.5 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +5.6%
- Total population: 25,266
49. Vero Beach South, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.9 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +24.7%
- Total population: 29,965
48. Temescal Valley, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $5.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +11.1%
- Total population: 28,227
47. Wright, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +12.5%
- Total population: 26,272
46. Highland, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $4.6 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.8%
- Total population: 56,789
45. Central, LA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $3.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.7%
- Total population: 29,518
44. Charleston, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $21.6 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +14.3%
- Total population: 149,960
43. Colton, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $3.4 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -0.4%
- Total population: 53,959
42. Gilroy, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $10.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +8.4%
- Total population: 58,696
41. Texas City, TX
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.3 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +12.3%
- Total population: 53,084
40. Port St. Lucie, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $19.9 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +17.8%
- Total population: 210,520
39. Prairieville, LA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $3.3 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +12.0%
- Total population: 34,215
38. San Jacinto, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $3.8 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +15.2%
- Total population: 54,077
37. Slidell, LA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.5 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.4%
- Total population: 28,690
36. Pleasanton, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.8/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $28.2 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -0.8%
- Total population: 78,691
35. Horizon West, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.9/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $6.0 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +131.0%
- Total population: 58,595
34. Jacksonville, NC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 95.9/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.5 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -2.4%
- Total population: 71,908
33. Atlantic City, NJ
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.0/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -1.5%
- Total population: 38,487
32. Rockledge, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.0/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.6 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +4.9%
- Total population: 27,808
31. West Melbourne, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.5 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +28.9%
- Total population: 26,762
30. Lake Jackson, TX
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +2.3%
- Total population: 27,954
29. Melbourne, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.2/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $6.2 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +6.7%
- Total population: 84,982
28. Yucaipa, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $5.8 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +2.4%
- Total population: 54,428
27. Santa Paula, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.4/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.4 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +1.5%
- Total population: 30,788
26. Daphne, AL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.4/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.6 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +12.9%
- Total population: 27,861
25. Houma, LA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.8 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -2.0%
- Total population: 33,094
24. Hayward, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $22.3 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +2.3%
- Total population: 160,602
23. North Charleston, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $6.0 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +7.0%
- Total population: 115,755
22. Crestview, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.8/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +18.4%
- Total population: 27,427
21. Dublin, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.8/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $19.9 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +24.6%
- Total population: 71,068
20. Wilmington, NC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 96.8/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $9.9 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +1.5%
- Total population: 116,933
19. Panama City, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.2 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -6.6%
- Total population: 34,254
18. Mount Pleasant, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $19.4 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +12.7%
- Total population: 90,945
17. Hinesville, GA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.0 million
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.6%
- Total population: 34,732
16. Hollister, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.5/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $4.8 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +13.2%
- Total population: 42,093
15. Banning, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.3 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -2.9%
- Total population: 29,929
14. Key West, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $4.8 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.0%
- Total population: 26,078
13. Newark, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $11.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +4.2%
- Total population: 47,470
12. Brawley, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.7/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.2 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +2.1%
- Total population: 26,509
11. Summerville, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 97.9/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $4.2 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +3.5%
- Total population: 50,839
10. Fort Pierce, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.0/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.9 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +6.6%
- Total population: 47,153
9. Hilton Head Island, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $10.4 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -4.9%
- Total population: 37,708
8. Eureka, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.1/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.0 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: -1.9%
- Total population: 26,519
7. Beaumont, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.2/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $5.5 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +22.7%
- Total population: 53,544
6. New Bern, NC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.2/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $2.0 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +5.8%
- Total population: 31,373
5. El Centro, CA
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +0.6%
- Total population: 44,184
4. Bluffton, SC
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $4.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +71.1%
- Total population: 29,375
3. Alvin, TX
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 98.6/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $1.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +5.9%
- Total population: 27,325
2. Galveston, TX
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 99.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $3.7 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +7.2%
- Total population: 53,265
1. Parkland, FL
- FEMA National Risk Index score: 99.3/100
- Total value of owner-occupied homes: $8.1 billion
- Population change, 2017 to 2022: +20.5%
- Total population: 34,832